Plant license renewal and economic issues are highlighting the need for advanced inspection, repair, replacement, and mitigation technologies for buried pipe.
Concerns about the health of buried piping have spurred
increased regulatory attention related to license
renewal activities, and increased plant attention
due to the cost and time required for repairing or
replacing pipe with excessive degradation. Unlike
above-ground piping systems, buried pipes can corrode
and foul from the fluid side and corrode or experience
mechanical damage from the soil side. Also, although
the corrosion mechanisms are generally slow, they
are cumulative, with leak frequency increasing as
plants reach 30 years of operation.
EPRI’s Buried Pipe Initiative targets research
spanning inspection, repair and replacement options
for buried piping. Ongoing activities include:
Buried Pipe Integrity Group –
EPRI organized this group to promote buried pipe experience
sharing, provide training to plant personnel, compile
information from industry experts, and sponsor related
research projects. The next meeting will be July 22-23,
2008 in Jacksonville, Fla.
Programmatic Recommendations –
EPRI has developed draft “what-to-do”
guidance for plant personnel in controlling buried
pipe degradation (Technical Report 1016456). A multi-stage
review by nuclear industry experts will facilitate
final document release by late 2008 or early 2009.
Risk Ranking Software – Because
nuclear plants contain 15 to 30 buried piping systems,
each potentially encountering tens to hundreds of
different conditions (e.g., burial conditions, soil
properties, cathodic protection, coatings, linings,
materials, joints, applied loads, fluid conditions,
etc.), it is not practical or necessary to inspect
each system under every condition. EPRI is developing
software to apply risk-informed ranking in prioritizing
inspection locations. A beta release is scheduled
for late summer 2008.
High-Density Polyethylene Piping
– High-density polyethylene (HDPE) represents
an attractive option for repair and replacement of
corroding metal pipe as compared to carbon steel,
exhibiting no tendency to corrode, foul, or host tubercles
or bi-valves. HDPE can also be installed much faster
and less expensively than metal pipe. In January 2007,
ASME approved Code Case N-755, which contains rules
for the installation of HDPE in Class 3 systems. EPRI
is supporting NRC approval of Code Case N-755 for
HDPE installation in Class 3 piping systems through
materials property development, fusing and repair
standards, and nondestructive evaluation methods.
|